Record of Case Results


Minnesota Criminal Defense Attorney Case Results

Case Results:

State vs. M.C.A.

Date: December 4, 2015

County: Hennepin County

Charges: Misdemeanor Fourth Degree DWI Minn. Stat. §169A.20, subd. 1(1) and (5).

Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial
Outcome: DWI charges dismissed. Client pled guilty to careless driving and avoided jail and STS.

State vs. J.I.F.

Date: April 5, 2015

County: St. Louis County – Hibbing

Charges: Felony Sale of Methamphetamine – First Degree and Felony Possession of Methamphetamine in the Second Degree in violation of Minn. Stat. § 152.021 subd. 1 and Minn. Stat. § 152.022 subd. 2 (a)(1).

Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial
Outcome: Client was facing a presumptive commit to 130 months in prison. Mr. Grostyan, while discussing defenses and motions to suppress evidence from trial, was able to reach an agreement with the County Attorney to a plea to a lesser charge without any prison or jail time.

State vs. D.W.S.

Date: 02/18/2015

County: Hennepin

Charges: Damage to Property Fourth Degree Minn. Stat. § 609.595.

Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial
Outcome: Continued for dismissal.

 

State vs. M.J.M

Date: December 2, 2014

County: Hennepin

Charges: Second Degree DWI Test Refusal Minn. Stat. § 169A.20, subd. 2.

Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan negotiated a dismissal of the Second Degree DWI charge, return of the forfeited vehicle without any costs awarded to the State, no jail, a plea to a lesser DWI charge with only a fine as a penalty and this was done without the client appearing in court.

 

State vs. A.L.P

Date: May 8, 2014

County: Hennepin

Charges: Felony 5th degree Drug Possession in violation of Minn. Stat. § 152.025 subd. 2 (a) (1) while in possession of a firearm Minn. Stat. § 609.11, which carried a mandatory 36 month prison sentence.

Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Omnibus hearing
Outcome: Felony charges dismissed and client avoided prison.

State vs. J.I.F.

Date: December 2, 2014

County: Hennepin County

Charges:        Theft of Identity Minn. Stat. §609.527, subd, 2

Financial Transaction Card Fraud Minn. Stat. §609.821, subd. 2(1)

Theft of Property-Felony Minn. Stat. §609.52, subd. 2 (a)(1)

Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial
Outcome: Client was facing a presumptive commit to prison for 70-80 months. Mr. Grostyan was able to obtain a dispositional departure for his client which meant no prison and no jail.

State vs. S.L

Date: March 18, 2014

County: Ramsey

Charges: Second Degree DWI Test Refusal Minn. Stat. § 169A.20, subd. 2.

Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Jury Trial
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was successfully able to negotiate a plea to the 3rd Degree DWI only. The 2nd Degree Refusal charge was dismissed. A vehicle forfeiture also arose out of this, and Mr. Grostyan was able to arrange for the return of the vehicle.

 

State vs. T.R.H.

Date: 2/10/2014

County: Anoka

Charges: Gross Misdemeanor 3rd Degree DWI Minn. Stat. § 169A.20 subd. 1 (5) and Minn. Stat. § 169A.26, subd. 1 (a)(5).

Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial
Outcome: Gross Misdemeanor charges dismissed. Pled to a lesser misdemeanor charge with no jail time.

State vs. B.L.

Date: November 22, 2013

County: Hennepin

Charges: Third Degree DWI Test Refusal Minn. Stat. § 169A.26, subd. 1 (b)

Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan negotiated a dismissal of the Third Degree DWI Test Refusal charge with a plea to a misdemeanor DWI charge, no jail.

State vs. C.M.B

Date: 02/26/2013

County: Ramsey

Charges: Misdemeanor 4th Degree DWI Minn. Stat. § 169A.20 subd. 1 (1) and (5).

Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial
Outcome: DWI charges dismissed. Pled guilty to careless driving.

State v. C.Y.S.
Date: January 7, 2014
County: Ramsey
Charges: Fourth Degree DWI, Minn. Stat. §169A.20, subd. 1 (1) and 4th Degree DWI, Minn. Stat. §169A.20, subd. 1 (5).
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Jury Trial
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan challenged whether his client was in physical control of the vehicle, when the client was in the driver’s seat, the engine was not running and the police, despite alleging they saw keys in the client’s hand, could not locate the keys to the vehicle. The prosecutor agreed to dismiss the DWI charges.


State v. C.M.R.
Date: December 18, 2013
County: Washington
Charges: Felony Drug Possession
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Client was caught with over three pounds of marijuana. Mr. Grostyan negotiated an agreement where the case would be dismissed in six months.


State v. C.Y.S.
Date: November 26, 2013
County: Wright
Charges: Felony Fleeing a Peace Officer in a Motor Vehicle, Minn. Stat. § 609.487, subd. 3 and Fourth Degree DWI, Minn. Stat. §169A.20.
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Evidence included a squad car video showing client’s vehicle driving at a high rate of speed during police pursuit. Mr. Grostyan negotiated an agreement where the Felony would be dismissed.


State v. M.L.J.
Date: October 9, 2013
County: Washington
Charges: Theft
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Motion Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan convinced the judge to grant an expungement of his client’s record.


State v. H.C.W.
Date: December 3, 2103
County: Ramsey
Charges: Fourth Degree DWI – Operate a Motor Vehicle Under the Influence of Alcohol, 169A.20, subd. 1 (1) and ; 4th Degree DWI – Operate a Motor Vehicle Alcohol Concentration over .08 within 2 hours of driving, §169A.20, subd. 1 (5).
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Contested Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan challenged the legality of the vehicle stop. The District Court granted the motion, and all charges were dismissed.


State v. J.T.P.
Date: October 18, 2013
County: Ramsey
Charges: Degree DWI – Operate a Motor Vehicle Under the Influence of Alcohol, 169A.20, subd. 1 (1) and ; 4th Degree DWI – Operate a Motor Vehicle Alcohol Concentration over .08 within 2 hours of driving, §169A.20, subd. 1 (5).
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing and Implied Consent Court Trial
Outcome: DWI charges were dismissed and the license revocation was rescinded from client’s driving record based on Mr. Grostyan’s argument that the police needed a warrant in order to make his client submit to a breath test.


State v. B.C.S.
Date: March 4, 2013
County: Dakota
Charges: Domestic Assault Attempt to Inflict Bodily Harm; Minn. Stat. 609.2242 subd. 1 (2).
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Jury Trial
Outcome: The prosecutor dismissed all charges and the judge terminated the no-contact order. Mr. Grostyan was also successful in getting the judge to remove or expunge these charges from his client’s record.


State v. H.A.R.
Date: June 3, 2013
County: Olmsted (2013)
Charges: 4th Degree DWI – Operate a Motor Vehicle Under the Influence of Alcohol, 169A.20, subd. 1 (1) and ; 4th Degree DWI – Operate a Motor Vehicle Alcohol Concentration over .08 within 2 hours of driving, 169A.20, subd. 1 (5).
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Jury Trial
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan challenged the admissibility of the urine test. The County Attorney dismissed both charges prior to jury trial.


State v. B.M.P.
Date: November 5, 2012
County: Anoka
Charges: Gross Misdemeanor Second Degree DWI; Gross Misdemeanor Driving After Cancellation-Inimical to Public Safety.
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Defendant was facing a mandatory 90 day jail sentence and his vehicle had been seized. Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully negotiate a resolution whereby the client pled guilty to a misdemeanor DWI with no jail to be served and all Gross Misdemeanor charges, including the charge that supported the vehicle seizure, were dismissed.


State v. T.L.M.
Date: November 20, 2012
County: Nicollet
Charges: DWI Vehicle Seizure
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to negotiate an agreement for the vehicle to be returned to the Defendant.


State v. C.F.W.
Date: December 10, 2012
County: Hennepin
Charges: Disorderly Conduct, Obstruction of Legal Process.
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully negotiate a resolution whereby the court entered a stay of adjudication and avoided any criminal conviction.


State v. T.B.H.
Date: December 10, 2012
County: Hennepin
Charges: Disorderly Conduct, Obstruction of Legal Process.
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully negotiate a resolution whereby the court entered a stay of adjudication and avoided any criminal conviction.


State v. C.J.H.
Date: November 16, 2012
County: Olmsted
Charges: Gross Misdemeanor Second Degree DWI and Vehicle Seizure.
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully negotiate a resolution whereby the client pled guilty to a lesser DWI charge and the remaining charges, including the charge that supported the vehicle seizure, were dismissed.


State v. M.A.A.
Date: September 20, 2012
County: Hennepin
Charges: Speeding
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Arraignment
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully negotiate a resolution whereby the speeding ticket was dismissed without the client attending court.


State v. A.M.G.
Date: November 5, 2012
County: Hennepin
Charges: Misdemeanor Fourth Degree DWI
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully negotiate a resolution whereby the client pled guilty to careless driving and avoided a DWI conviction. This was an extraordinary outcome in light of the fact that the client’s breath test was .18.


State v. C.M.R.
Date: July 9, 2012
County: Hennepin
Charges: Felony Drug Possession
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully negotiate a resolution whereby the court entered a stay of adjudication and the client avoided a criminal conviction.


State v. S.D.
Date: August 29, 2012
County: Hennepin
Charges: Felony Drug Possession
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully negotiate a resolution whereby the court entered a stay of adjudication and the client avoided a criminal conviction.


State v. J.C.S.
Date: August 9, 2012
County: Hennepin
Charges: Misdemeanor Fourth Degree DWI
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully negotiate a resolution whereby the client pled guilty to careless driving and avoided a DWI conviction.


State v. J.A.
Date: November 8, 2012
County: Anoka
Charges: Misdemeanor DWI –Under 21 Drinking and Driving; Speeding.
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully negotiate a resolution whereby the client pled guilty to Minor Consumption and the remaining charges were dismissed. As a result of this plea agreement, the client avoided a driver’s license revocation.


State v. J.D.G.
Date: November 2, 2012
County: Hennepin
Charges: Felony Domestic Assault-By Strangulation.
Trial Attorney: Anthony Grostyan
Trial Type: Jury Trial
Outcome: After a week-long jury trial including testimony of eight witnesses for the State, despite the judge preventing the defense medical expert from testifying, Mr. Grostyan gave a closing argument that convinced the jury to find his client NOT GUILTY of Felony Domestic Assault by Strangulation.


State v. K. J. W.
Date: March 7, 2012
County: Anoka
Charges: Felony Terroristic Threats; Felony Domestic Assault-By Strangulation; Domestic Assault.
Trial Attorney: Anthony Grostyan
Trial Type: Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Client was offered plea to Felony and several years in prison. Mr. Grostyan attacked the truthfulness of the alleged victim’s statements. Both Felony charges were dismissed. Client pled to misdemeanor causing fear of domestic assault with no prison or jail time.


State v. J. J. .C.
Date: August 7, 2012
County: Hennepin
Charges: Probation violation of a Gross Misdemeanor DWI
Trial Attorney: Anthony Grostyan
Trial Type: Probation hearing
Outcome: Probation officer asked judge to impose 180 days of jail for client’s failure to stay in contact with probation for three years and failure to follow any recommendations of probation. Mr. Grostyan convinced the judge to take his client off probation without any jail or penalties.


State v. J.T.
Date: August 6, 2012
County: Ramsey
Charges: Domestic Assault
Trial Attorney: Anthony Grostyan
Trial Type: Jury Trial
Outcome: On the day of trial, the prosecutor dismissed all charges and the judge terminated to no-contact order.


State v. A.M.G.
Date: October 27, 2011
County: Wright
Charges: Misdemeanor Speed 105/55; Misdemeanor Window Tint Violation
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Bench Trial
Outcome: During the trial, Mr. Grostyan argued that the window tint statute was unconstitutionally vague and the state could not prove he was speeding. Defendant was acquitted of both charges.


State v. M.T.M.
Date: October 17, 2011
County: Martin
Charges: Misdemeanor Possession of Marijuana in a Motor Vehicle; Petty Misdemeanor Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: A conviction on the Possession of Marijuana in a Motor Vehicle would have resulted in a driver’s license revocation for the client. Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully negotiate a resolution whereby the client would pay a fine on the Petty Misdemeanor Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, which is not considered a crime, and the Misdemeanor Possession of Marijuana in a Motor Vehicle charge was dismissed. The client did not incur a driver’s license revocation. In addition, the client lived out-of-state and the matter resolved without the client returning to Minnesota to deal with the charges.


State v. B.L.V.
Date: August 29, 2011
County: Dakota
Charges: Possession of Burglary Tools
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Client had no defenses available. Mr. Grostyan was able to work with the County Attorney to see that the client was not also charged with a felony burglary charge in exchange for client’s guilty plea on possession of burglary tools. Client was not required to serve any additional jail time as a result of conviction.


State v. J.F.B.
Date: August 18, 2011
County: Hennepin
Charges: Felony Fleeing a Peace Officer; Felony DWI Refusal
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Client plead to Felony DWI Refusal charge and the Felony Fleeing a Peace Officer charge was dismissed. Client was ordered to serve 45 days in the workhouse work release, and was able to serve another 75 days on electronic home monitoring. Client did not have to serve any jail or prison time.


State v. D.R.
Date:
August 4, 2011
County: Stearns (2010)
Charges: 4th Degree DUI
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to successfully challenge the urine test results, and the County Attorney agreed to dismiss the DUI charge. D.R. plead to careless driving.


State v. M.H.M.
Date:
April 20, 2011
County: Hennepin (2011)
Charges: 3rd Degree Drug Possession
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Contested Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan filed a motion to suppress evidence. Prior to the hearing, the County Attorney agreed to dismiss all charges against M.H.M.


State v. P.M.M.
Date:
February 24, 2011
County: Hennepin (2011)
Charges: No Proof of Insurance and Driving After Suspension
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: A conviction on either of these charges would have resulted in the client incurring additional driver’s license suspension time. Mr. Grostyan was successful the entire matter dismissed.


State v. D.P.L.
Date:
September 20, 2010
County: Hennepin (2008)
Charges: 4th Degree DWI; Gross Misdemeanor Criminal Vehicular Operation
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to negotiate for a dismissal of the Gross Misdemeanor Criminal Vehicular Operation. D.P.L. pleaded to a Misdemeanor 4th Degree DWI.


State v. O.G.T.
Date:
September 14, 2010
County: Hennepin (2010)
Charges: 4th Degree DWI
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to negotiate the charge down to a payable, petty misdemeanor traffic violation. The DWI charge was dismissed.


State v. D.P.L.
Date:
September 20, 2010
County: Hennepin (2008)
Charges: 4th Degree DWI; Gross Misdemeanor Criminal Vehicular Operation
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to negotiate for a dismissal of the Gross Misdemeanor Criminal Vehicular Operation. D.P.L. pleaded to a Misdemeanor 4th Degree DWI.


State v. O.G.T.
Date:
September 14, 2010
County: Hennepin (2010)
Charges: 4th Degree DWI
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to negotiate the charge down to a payable, petty misdemeanor traffic violation. The DWI charge was dismissed.


State v. A.E.B.
Date:
September 1, 2010
County: Crow Wing (2010)
Charges: 3rd Degree DWI; 2nd Degree Test Refusal; Probation Violation
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was successfully able to negotiate a plea to the 3rd Degree DWI only. The 2nd Degree Refusal charge and the probation violation were dismissed. A vehicle forfeiture also arose out of this, and Mr. Grostyan was able to arrange for the return of the vehicle.


State v. M.T.S.
Date:
August 13, 2010
County: Hennepin (2010)
Charges: Obstructing Legal Process (Misdemeanor)
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: State dismissed the charges the day of the hearing.


State v. C.M.M.
Date:
August 11, 2010
County: Anoka (2010)
Charges: 4th Degree DWI
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was able to negotiate the charge down to a careless driving.


State v. J.W.V.
Date:
August 10, 2010
County: Hennepin (2010)
Charges: Simple Robbery (Felony)
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Contested Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan brought motions to include the alleged victim’s criminal history. State agreed to dismiss felony charge in exchange for plea to a lesser misdemeanor offense.


State v. J.M.P.
Date:
August 5, 2010
County: Stearns (2010)
Charges: 2nd Degree DWI; Carrying a Pistol while Under the Influence of Alcohol (Misdemeanor); Open Bottle (Misdemeanor); Possession of Over 1.4 Grams Marijuana in Motor Vehicle (Misdemeanor)
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Contested Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan brought motions to challenge the stop of Defendant’s vehicle. After negotiations with the prosecutor, the parties agreed that all charges would be dismissed, and J.M.P. would plead to 3rd Degree DWI. J.M.P. was sentenced to electronic home monitoring, and did not have to serve any jail time. A vehicle forfeiture also occurred, and Mr. Grostyan was able to have the vehicle returned to J.M.P.


State v. S.W.B.
Date:
June 7, 2010
County: Hennepin (2010)
Charges: Domestic Assault (Misdemeanor); Disorderly Conduct
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Pretrial Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan attacked the truthfulness of the alleged victim’s statements. All charges were dismissed.


State v. T.N.T.
Date:
April 16, 2010
County: Isanti (2009)
Charges: 3rd Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct; 4th Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Consented Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan worked with the prosecutor to get the charges dismissed.


State v. D.A.B.
Date:
April 7, 2010
County: Dakota (2009)
Charges: Assaulting a Peace Officer (Gross Misdemeanor); Obstructing Legal Process (Misdemeanor); Disorderly Conduct
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was successfully able to negotiate for dismissal of all charges on the condition that Defendant comply with conditions of probation for a period of one year.


State v. L.M.A.
Date:
May 6, 2009
County: Hennepin (2008)
Charges: 3rd Degree DWI; 2nd Degree Test Refusal
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Omnibus Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan was successfully able to negotiate a plea to the 3rd Degree DWI only. The 2nd Degree Refusal charge was dismissed.


United States vs. B.J.N.
Date:
October 7, 2008
County: Federal Charges (2008)
Charges: Conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture containing cocaine; 50 grams or more of a mixture containing a cocaine base
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Sentencing
Outcome: The Government asked that B.J.N. be imprisoned for 34 years. Mr. Grostyan was able to argue for a departure from the Government’s recommendation down to 11 years of incarceration for B.J.N.


C.J.R. v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Date:
September 24, 2008
County: Hennepin (2008)
Charges: Driving While Under the Influence
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Implied Consent Hearing
Outcome: Judge granted Mr. Grostyan’s Motion to Order the State to produce the Source Code for the Intoxilyzer 5000; Revocation rescinded.


State v. G.L.B.
Date:
August 28, 2008
County: Carver (2007)
Charges: 3rd Degree DWI; Open Bottle; Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Contest Ominbus Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan challenged the legality of the vehicle stop. The District Court granted the motion, and the charges were dismissed.


K.J.W. v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Date:
June 26, 2008
County: Anoka (2007)
Charges: Test Refusal
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Implied Consent Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan successfully argued that Petitioner’s refusal to test was reasonable. License revocation rescinded.


R.L.C. v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Date:
October 15, 2007
County: Wright (2007)
Charges: Driving While Under the Influence
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Implied Consent Hearing
Outcome: Mr. Grostyan successfully negotiated for no license revocation after proving to the Attorney General’s Office that Petitioner’s conduct was not in violation of any applicable law.


D.H.V. v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Date:
October 3, 2007
County: Hennepin (2007)
Charges: Driving While Under the Influence
Trial Attorney: Anthony M. Grostyan
Trial Type: Implied Consent Hearing
Outcome: After contested hearing, Judge granted Mr. Grostyan’s motion to rescind license revocation on grounds that Petitioner’s right to counsel was violated. State dismissed related criminal charges for same reason prior to hearing.

Rate this page